18 January, 2011
Why our lives are becoming precarious – ecological reality bites
Posted by pbrandis under nature and culture | Tags:
1 Comment
Our lives are very precious. But our hold on life seems precarious, especially in these times of troubles. There have always been troubles, of course, but they seem more dominant and larger recently.
Recent events such as the floods in Queensland, Australia, Sri Lanka, Brazil, and the Philippines have caused waves of destruction, and many lives have been lost. The great forces of nature can be capricious.
To understand life as precarious means accepting that the life we have may be taken away at any moment. To understand our very existence is precarious means that we accept that humans are animals positioned in the food chain – that we can be food for others, be they large carnivores, or bacteria.
It means accepting we are not masters of a tamed and malleable nature. It means accepting our ecological vulnerability – we are vulnerable to so many things, from a tick to a tsunami, from a carnivore to a car crash.
And in the current dislocated world of emergent crises, it seems our lives have never been more vulnerable.
And then I wonder: How do we respond to our vulnerability? What actions do we take?
The modern world seems to harbour notions that we stand outside of nature – that we are not embedded in an ecology. (Surely the recent natural disasters show the folly of this?) We seem to hold to the illusion that humans are invulnerable, with our magnificent creations, our cities, our technologies. But what if all of this, all of this human inventiveness and cleverness, is making us even more vulnerable, making our lives, and especially the lives of the poor, even more precarious?
How do we take corrective measures to a system that allows economic privilege and the short-sightedness of the economic sphere to overwhelm the ecological realities in which we all live?
Val Plumwood, the late Australian philosopher, stated it this way: Our ethical and spiritual failures are closely linked to our perceptual and prudential failures in situating ourselves as ecological beings.
As ecological realities start to bite hard, it is time to reassess our lives and our relationship to nature, and become sensitive to ecological limits and dependencies. In doing this we become even more aware of our precarious and precious lives.
March 21st, 2011 at 10:26 am
Brilliant post, but I wanted to add a more basic question; why are so many people blind to the devastation already done and still happening to our planet’s weather systems, atmosphere, and ecosystems, including its viability to sustain even our most basic needs for food supply and water? Why am I faced with cynicism, smirks and arguments when I try to discuss what is “physically” happening to those delicate systems upon which we are completely dependent on for our very lives? Why aren’t topics such as the annihilation of bee populations or the shifting earth’s axis as important and focused on by the news media as much as the constant barrage about our everlasting wars (when will get past this need to hate?), various murders (when genocide is happening every day), religious intolerance (a whole subject on its own) and our egocentric past-times (like “Dancing with the Stars” or Sports)? Why don’t we invest the same amount of time, emotions, energy and resources to balancing the needs of our planet and our fellow occupants (human and animal) as we do to sustain our favorite entertainments and sports ? It boggles my mind! Does the human race have the capacity to “evolve” or are we just going to sit in our state rooms’ staring at computer screens and texting as the ship slowly sinks? Is humanity capable of saving itself?